Sermon on the Mount
A Whole Person Issue
Psalm 51:5-12; Matthew
5:21-48
i.
I have said it
before, and I will continue to say it again and again, this is religiously
revolutionary content. This is truth contra-mundum. Herein lies
the description of something unlike anything else, anywhere else, at anytime
with any group of people.
i.
Research has
done a fair job of arguing for both possibilities of Jesus’ meaning here.
ii.
He could mean,
that the law of Moses said, and now I deliver a new law
iii.
Or he could be
referencing the traditional laws surrounding the law.
1. Given the fact that he just emphasized the validity
of the Mosaic Law and its permanence and his directed attention to the Pharisees,
I think it is appropriate to suggest that Jesus is referencing the tradition
around the law.
iv.
So, this is Contra
Pharisaic/traditionalist not contra Torah
1. I am afraid we fail to recognize the
intimacy we have with the Scriptures since the reformation. There are no other
books, No other authority; the Pope does not stand equal with the word. There
are only Church Confessions and denomination declarations. The Bible and only
the Bible is the absolute rule of faith. Like Luther, Jesus was not changing
the demands but rather stripping them down to there actual content. Religion
constant adds culture and moray to God.
2. To complicate matters, again like the
period of the reformation, Hebrew was largely lost to the general public and
they had synchronized into an Aramaic speaking population. Consequently the
Jews had to rely on the “Clergy” to interpret their Law.
v.
Stick
with me now :~) See, if you can follow the confusing maze of authority.
1. Following the first period of Old
Testament scribal tradition, the period of the Sopherim (c. 400 B.C. -c. a.d. 200), there appeared a second, the Talmudic period (c. a.d. 100-c. 500),
which was followed by the better-known
Masoretic tradition (c. 500-c. 950). Ezra worked with the first of these
groups, and they were regarded as the Bible custodians until after the time of
Christ. Between a.d. 100 and 500, the Talmud (instruction, teaching) grew up as a body of Hebrew civil
and canonical law based on the Torah (613
Mitzvot). The Talmud basically represents the opinions and decisions of
Jewish teachers from about 300 b.c. to a.d. 500, and
it consists of two main divisions: the Mishnah and the Gemara.
a. Mishnah
The Mishnah (repetition, explanation, and teaching) was completed at
about a.d. 200, and was a digest of all the oral laws from the time of Moses.
It was regarded as the Second Law, the Torah being the First Law. This work was
written in Hebrew, and it covered traditions as well as explanations of the
oral law.
b. Gemara
The Gemara (to complete, accomplish, and learn) was written in Aramaic
rather than Hebrew, and was basically an expanded commentary on the Mishnah. It
was transmitted in two traditions, the Palestinian Gemara (c. a.d. 200), and
the larger and more authoritative Babylonian Gemara (c. a.d. 500).
2. The Midrash (textual study, textual
interpretation) was actually a formal doctrinal and homiletical exposition of
the Hebrew Scriptures written in Hebrew and Aramaic. Midrashim (plural) were
collected into a body of material between 100 b.c. and
a.d. 300. Within the Midrash were two major parts: the Halakah (procedure), a further expansion of the Torah only,
and the Haggada (declaration,
explanation), being commentaries on the entire Old Testament. These Midrashim
differed from the Targums in that the former were actually commentaries,
whereas the latter were paraphrases. The Midrashim contain some of the earliest
extant synagogue homilies on the Old Testament, including such things as
proverbs and parables.
i.
Like a breath of
fresh air, Christ says, “but I say”. He takes it back to the Basics, stripped
of human invention
ii.
Christ establishes
himself as the authorized interpreter of the law in a crowd of Pharisees! Who
proclaimed themselves as the authorized expounders of the law, but here Jesus
claims authorship privileges!
iii.
He uses the
astonishing and very assertive Egw legw
i.
Examples: could
be 10, could be 50, they are examples of this point:
ii.
The law has
always been about the heart, the head
and the hand
iii.
In which case,
it continues to be entirely awesome, not only must we behave right, we must
think right! The law did, does and continues to be the only thing it could be -
a demand for perfection. How else can we relate to an all-holy, all-knowing,
all-powerful, eternal being? Only in absolute perfection, far and above
whatever the Pharisee was telling anybody, could we relate to God of our own
accord. This makes Jesus’ point perfectly. If I may change the order of the
Sermon. I imagine that he stated these demands first and then made it clear
that the only ones who will be blessed (happy, congratulated) will be those who
are poor in Spirit! Wouldn’t that come as a relief? Well, it is still the same
relief, be because it forms the foundation of this rule.
iv.
Fight the
temptation to adopt these as your new rules unless you are adopting the superceding
truths- God is absolutely holy and by his nature must require absolute
holiness, but take heart Christ has come as your advocate and he has credited
you with his perfect obedience of holiness. Now he gives you the truth imbedded
in the law it calls you out in head, heart and hand!
i.
Read Matthew
5:27-30
ii.
Profundity of
sin – deeply impacting and wounding; requiring the death of the divine man
iii.
Pluck it out and
cut it off
iv.
Anecdotal story
from GCTS. Son ship-done, sin everything is lost perhaps even you life
v.
There is no
gospel without a theology of sin. Period. Sins impact in Christian Life and to
the lost.
1. We do nobody any favor when we mitigate the impact of
sin. It destroys, it kills it mains, and it’s ugly. It holds out the same
stupid promise of pleasure than garbs you and takes you down. It the same lie
sin has offered since the beginning of time –just do it. It is so destroying!